This foundational review helped establish a more modern clinical understanding of testosterone in women. Panay and Fenton outline testosterone’s physiologic relevance across multiple body systems and argue that its role in women’s health has historically been underestimated. While older than some of the more recent consensus papers, this article remains an important bridge between traditional hormone thinking and the more complete view that testosterone is a necessary component of female physiology, not simply a “male hormone.” (Europe PMC)
In short: this foundational review is often cited because it helped re-establish testosterone as an important hormone in women’s health, not simply a male hormone.


